earthlydelights2006 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

great!

heatherp526 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

im digging this video! my names Elizabeth, kinda feelin bored if any1 wants to join me on cam or wana chat i will be signed on at __ PLAY-CAM...dot...COM __ my user ID there is Elizabeth_epxxqj chat soon xx its FR33 to j0in! mwah

gecekusu36 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

uzuri's mother

PyePye7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Vostell reverts to the effect of early TV transmission test pictures from the 30's where electronic synchronisation was a major task. Later, technological progress presented the brains smoother imagery which made it easier to find sense/interpretation'. This video shows imagery with large holes in-between, the brain has to work harder allowing it more space for all sorts of interpretations which would usually work against the interest of the manipulators >TV stations and groups behind.

PyePye7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Of course, can be re-entered anytime - agree. To add >the resulting impact of an art statement is first related to the Zeitgeist at which point it was created. It may then be perceived:In phase (time-wise), out of phase (as with many old Masters) or in-phase again later resonance-wise. Some things come back again & again, may even take on a new meaning etc...

popeseyes (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

why cannot this work be re-entered at anytime.. my synapses still snap to Rembrandt etc and are not set to any o'clock

PyePye7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Is this a translation machine?

aurileide (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I agree with you. Wolf´s research about the "new media" of his time was so important to nowadays art movements that it is simply impossible to think about it without considering the movement ot video and computer art. He was a brilliant artist. Pity not everybody understand his meaning. But I was glad to hear that you do.

PyePye7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Wolf's long dead & got other fish to fry. Vid Art was a new media in the 60's and +-provocative to the eyes/minds back then. Today, the synapses are conditioned according to now. Certain Art Statements (of the 60's) are to be quite likely irrelevant today. Did their job back then and to be switched off afterwards (except for the museums). Expectations that things have to last forever are illusionary, look at good food! Wolf obviously lived for the Now, a modest & sympathetic gesture.

blueseagull (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I do love fluxus, but I think I prefer the Dada manifesto ;D