|
jaguarclaw (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think the scientists are a bit over zealous. But I have found a few flaws with einsteins theorys. I think we are overcomplicating things. I think trying to comprehend other dimensions is just too big for us at this moment.
10thdim (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
As Cosmologist Max Tegmark of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology says: "The critique of many worlds is shifting from 'it makes no sense and I hate it' to simply 'I hate it'."So - not every scientist agrees with the Many Worlds Interpretation. But now that physicist David Deutsch and his team at Oxford have published a proof equating these quantum outcomes with the parallel universes created through choice, your opinion disagrees with mainstream physicists like Tegmark and Deutsch.Rob
otonanoC (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
These videos are nonsense. The 4th dimension must be exactly equal to the line connecting the big bang to the end of this universe. Somehow, this video inserted a HUMAN BEING into the mix as some sort of cosmic observer, and then used human choice as a means of "branching" into the 5th and 6th dimensions. These videos are stupid. The 5th and 6th dimensions are not "branches" based off of human choice. Think about it, people.
Dan4157 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yay, I understand it now!!
bobulibobium (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I once sat on a turtle, it felt gooood!
ShinobiGarth (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wow...really intriguing. but i actually understood what he was talking about. crazy! now if we could only figure out how to bridge those dimensions and cross them. why? it would be a fun "field trip".
babylittlekelvin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
is it just me or is this confusing :P
Melissa4pple (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You're most probarbly saying this because you don't understand it. Many people find this sort of thing interesting. If you don't like it, smiply click the X in the corner of your screen.
Ackalan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Nice. Exept for mayby one thing. A 2D reality would have to be twisted two times since it can't have a "backside".Based from a 3D point of view. ;)
4darin5 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Really cool video. But, I'm a bit confusedabout one thing.The Big Bang? You mean, when the priest got ahold of those little boys? |
