tomitstube (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You have an odd sense of deduction. Your microcosm believes all liberals are "queer"?Not even close.

tomitstube (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Actually no, I didn't know Buckley opposed the war on drugs. Point made. My rant was more about fiscal conservative Republicans and there so called opposition to big government programs and big government intrusion. More myth than truth. Just like their campaign against so called "activist judges". When it comes to laws against abortion, evolution, stem cell reserch, gay marriage, legalization of pot, etc., neo-cons have no problem with activist judges ruling against personal freedoms.

MyName42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

you know, Buckley opposed the war on drugs . . .

HumanStrategy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You two need to get married or something. Your bickering back and forth is quite entertaining.^^

rippa76 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Vidal refers to him as a crypto Nazi, whereas Buckley replies by calling him a queer. Buckley was conservative--but not even close to a Nazi. Vidal, alas, is a queer.American conservatives vs. American Liberals in microcosm...

jsa4ever92 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Yes I am actually 16, and I'm a high school senior who just applied to Yale, and I am proud to say i have a 4.4 GPA, probably higher than your GPA was... I am in the process of becoming well educated. I would say what I said in person, but I am not interested in meeting some 57 year old perv... Buckley was not a whiner, or a apologist for pedophiles(like yourself), I belive i do know enough to speak accurately of Buckley, Vidal, and US politics in general, you sir, obviously do not know enough.

oldjoe5 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Buckley wasn't educated. He went to Yale like George W Bush

zxcv1234vcxz (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Buckley was prat, a wanker, an apologist for pedophiles and your role model. He was a whiner (like you) and pedantic (like you), but at least he was educated (unlike you).Now show up or shut up. But you won't - you're the pathetic sort who hides behind a computer to say things you wouldn't dare say in person. Are you actually 16, thus a know-nothing who doesn't know enough to speak accurately of Fuckley? Or are you 40-50 and claim you're 16 to try and meet underaged girls for sex?

jsa4ever92 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

who's childish now, you fucking moron. Insult Buckley one more time and I'll sock you in your goddamn face and you'll stay plastered.

jsa4ever92 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

no. Todays neocons are NOT the William F. Buckley conservitives of yesteryear.