|
GeorgesBarras (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Though some of his ideas do betray hints of consequentialism.
Mrmikeshelton (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
or more likely, if they could find some sort of sex scandal in his life or some other type of dirty gossip. Nobody tries to discredit someone else's ideas anymore, they just try to drag the person's reputation through the mud.
blunthelloblunthello (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They were duty-based, or "deontological."
Daywalker11226 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
was kants ethics were intentioned base or duty based?
deepdivestudios (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I am working on a model for "intelligent being". I call the project "Sapien 4.0". Sapien 1.0 is unintelligent life: protozoa, plants, etc.. Sapien 2.0 is intelligent life, up to but not including humans. Sapien 3.0 represents homo-sapien, and Sapien 4.0 is the next evolution after humans. It is partly artistic expression, but also based on actual scientific concepts. I invite you to check it out and let me know what you think.
philosoisgrt (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I see your point but you cant argue that this would not be a great thing to watch on tv.
philosoisgrt (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
you right in sayin that ..but sadly i think americas claim as "the greatest evolved country" simply means we just have more money..and the money system it uses is purely un-ethical which in my view it totally contradicts the claim of being "great"
erutuFoNtsaPoN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
sweet.
jml4000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
We don't have very many TV shows like this in America anymore because America is a nation of anti-intellectualism. It pains me to say that, I love my country; but most TV networks won't air anything like this unless they can somehow relaqte Kant and enlightenment philosiphy with wet t-shirt contests and monster trucks.
1974freud (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
well said |
