|
HubbaBubba9849 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and once we achieve perfect graphics, then what?
morgangamer22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
COOL
FeeLtheHertZ (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That's quite frankly not true at all. There's an immense noticeable difference between the best looking PS2 game and a mid-line Xbox 360 game; textures, lighting, view-distance, polygonal count, bit-mapping, bump-mapping, physics processing, and resolution. The list is huge.What is true is games are not going to look, in comparison, what PS1 games look like to PS3 games. What real life looks like isn't going to change, so the closer games get, that level of detail will always hold.
DiabloDave363 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
must have been amazing at the time
DiabloDave363 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
omg! its ENDLESS OCEAN!
woteva666666 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
what your saying is bull theres a lot of games on the 64 that hold up to dis day Perfect Dark, KI, Turok 2 id even play golden eye over halo any day. You think games look good now You'll be amazed cos games today wont be getting any better graphic wise the more graphics the more expensive to make more expensive to make the higher the risk A consoles life span is 5-6 years but as sony has said the ps3 will be around for over 10 years i rest my case MAN!
Minimoy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
not true actually.the graphical improvements are getting diminished already, aside from resolution many people already can't tell what the huge difference is between an Xbox 360 game and a PS2 game. Compared to the actual performance boost the appearance is less and less of a leap. This will continue to thin out.What will improve is the control schemes and perhaps the displays, that is somewhat different from console graphics. The paradigm of generational graphics is fast becoming passe.
Flamesofame (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
danger zone???
Moto200Alt (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Back then CDs were much slower and could hold less data due to limited compression techniques.Ever read the minimum requirements of an old 90's PC game? It requires you to have a x2 drive, and recommends x4. Now we have x52 in standard. Also, not always CD had 700MB of capacity.Watch a Philips CD-i commercial, and they'll show you how horrible movies looked on CDs in the early 90's.
ElectriceGA (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yeah, that's the best now. But you have to look back twelve years, when CDs were relatively young and their technology wasn't as developed as it is now. Paks win in the early 1990s. |
