bubbabrand (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

wow. you know a little science, but not enough. it took 11 frames to come around that one building, and 11 frames to enter the tower, yes. but what you are saying is it takes 11 frames to go THROUGH the tower when its actually just ENTERING it. the 2nd time you counted 11 frames, all that part of the plane was still traveling through the air, hence the 11 frames. and notice how long it took for anything to EXIT the tower, thats what you should have counted the 2nd time. thatd be travelin THROUGH

PEERAMIDEYE (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

what would happen if a plane of that type flew at those altitudes at high speeds?

xjackal24 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Well then please enlighten us with your knowledge.Or, maybe we shouldn't believe YOUR bullshit?

snakehipsohoolihan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The guy who posted this knows fuck all about how the WTC1/2 was built.Don't believe his bullshit.

ConspiracyArchive (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"There is no reason why a plane would just blow up outside or fall apart." I see a lot of more reasons for this , physical laws e.g., then I see reasons for just vanishing utterly.

Airportchris2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Its the height perspective, watch other videos of aircraft flying by, they appear to be moving slower than they actually are.

DarthKazi (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This is classic re-direction. They want you to look at the film, as if it is a fake, while ignoring the anomalies of the footage. None of these no-planers have described what made the very distinctive plane-shaped holes or what caused the flash right before the (perhaps enhanced military) plane struck. The plane shredded as it entered, causing minimal core damage (which NIST lied about), etc. There is no reason why a plane would just blow up outside or fall apart.

iamivandotcom (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

you guys are too silly. He is describing how unbelievable a moment in life like that is. Not that it's a movie set. He is saying this happens only in movies, who can imagine something crazy like that happening. But it does. And again as usual the conspiracy people have no clue about video and lenses and how it works. Depending on the angle WHICH is NOT right underneath the building but on a slight angle/degree this will cause different measurements of speed an length. it's photography 1o1

tedtheshed (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Fuck 9/11 truthers. Suck a dick in hell

noahman10 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

its a huge airliner traveling at incredible speed its going to take much more than one wall of a building to slow it down in the half second that it was entering the building. it clearing eventually slowed down but the outside edge of the WTC is not sturdy enough to stop a jumbo jet with that much momentum. the building does slow it down but not until it enters the building where it gets more resistence