|
vesnatesna (October 11, 2008 at 1:17 pm)
errr, he is on key, if ur a singer (even if ur not) u cant argue with that ... the performance is lovely...
monodogg83 (October 7, 2008 at 10:09 am)
ive been into Radiohead in the past year or two and regret that i wasnt into them when i was at school
samandnag (October 5, 2008 at 6:52 pm)
i like the way he sings live personally. but i can understand where khanoh89 is coming from though.ENJOY MY OPINION!
mashedown (September 15, 2008 at 3:26 pm)
who gives a fuck if he hit bum notes guys. Hes only human.
merdujapon1 (September 14, 2008 at 8:08 am)
why is everyone arguing about techniques? jesus christ just listen to the damn song and enjoy it for fucks sake
Aether77 (September 9, 2008 at 3:13 pm)
The point of the matter, khanoh89, is that even Thom's bum notes don't detract from his overall performance. I just listened to this performance and didn't cringe once. It's all about feeling, and Thom Yorke has it aplenty.Also, if you want perfection, or whatever you describe as perfection, go and listen to the studio version and leave the live fans alone. Idiot. Just because you have this "amazing" opinion that Thom sings badly doesn't mean we need to as well. It's opinion, mate, not fact.
omundodenagao (September 4, 2008 at 9:11 am)
MA-RA-VI-LHO-SO!!!
khanoh89 (August 30, 2008 at 9:38 pm)
"technical excellence doesn't always equate to listener pleasure.""I'd rather listen to The Ramones than Yes."I cannot comprehend you.
caspar01 (August 30, 2008 at 9:37 pm)
You misunderstand me, I meant that technical excellence doesn't always equate to listener pleasure. I'd rather listen to The Ramones than Yes.And it's very easy to say you're a better singer but, until you've done a gig in front of >50k people with monitors blowing up and unable to hear yourself, I don't think it's fair to make the comparison.
khanoh89 (August 30, 2008 at 9:27 pm)
It's his song - I obviously wouldn't dispute that. I just hope for the sake of the listener's ears that it's the record version. |
