|
1Trainwreck (July 19, 2008 at 1:26 am)
JGO126,Yeah, here are some very credible witnesses:watch?v=5BvmdWAIs14watch?v=YEgHU6pS-tgwatch?v=zuRnvWAfik0
justanotherkevin (July 19, 2008 at 12:22 am)
Steel light poles would shear off an aluminum wing.........are you a friggin idiot or what?Besides PILOTSFOR911TRUTH obtained the flight data from the aircraft that struck the Pentagon and the data puts the aircraft at 400' AGL in the area where the poles were knocked over. 400 feet above ground level bud. Look it up. PILOTSFOR911TRUTH. They are pilots and you aren't.
JGO126 (July 19, 2008 at 12:04 am)
There are many credible witnesses to the second plane. You are dumb
JGO126 (July 19, 2008 at 12:03 am)
They found body parts and airplane parts
LightAge2007 (July 18, 2008 at 11:49 pm)
yeah and this guy says there were no plane but the first guy at the WTC was just a dumbass that did'nt see the plane and if you look at normal plane crashes many times you won't find alot of debreif bush did try all this for an Iraq war then WTH was he thinking? if he wanted to invade he would have used false military attacks with Iraqi vihicals or somthing or perhapes a false tape of Iraq declearing war on ususing airliners and random attacks don't have anything to do with Iraq or oil
JGO126 (July 18, 2008 at 10:36 pm)
I believe it was a plane because there would be no advantage to the government to cover something like that up. People that say the the bush administration was responsible for the attack and digitally edited video after the fact are not thinking it all the way through. If they had wanted to destroy the buildings in order to gain support for an iraq invasion than why didn't they use airplanes. We have technology to rig a remote controlled 757.
lzepln (July 18, 2008 at 9:39 pm)
I agree with you (sort of), but the issue to me is the government. You can't deny that there are many things about 9/11 that don't add up. There is PROOF that things are not as they seem. The government will not address or even acknowledge these issues. Suspicious? the part of the 9/11 commission report that dealt with these theories was all classified. suspicious? The government IS covering something up no question. What do YOU think it is than? or do you believe Bush's bullshit explanation?
alexhb11290 (July 18, 2008 at 9:04 pm)
i dont believe everything that the news tells me but in this case i have commen sence to come to the conclusion that it was an air plane and these conspiracy theorists qre the ones fueling the fire not me and that some on needs to shut them some of these guys think that russia shot a missle at the pentagon that is pure stupidity
mskydolphin (July 18, 2008 at 7:00 pm)
Funny. I could be wrong, but it is odd tome that the planes involved on 9/11 were all at less than 50% seating capacity. Whew, good thing?
1Trainwreck (July 18, 2008 at 6:14 pm)
civwarfan,If you watch the actual news coverage you can see that there were no light poles knocked down. Pics on the internet popped up later on, but that doesn't count. Similar to the damage to the Twin Towers before they were blown up. The fake pics that showed up later on contradict the actual video that was aired that day. |
