|
manhattanprojec7 (October 12, 2008 at 6:22 am)
host is hot.. with or without photoshop
rednebula317 (October 12, 2008 at 1:07 am)
"Editors assume we know " They might as well put a label on it saying that it was photoshopped.
coldflame2007 (October 12, 2008 at 12:14 am)
plus i dont think she needed PS XD
coldflame2007 (October 12, 2008 at 12:12 am)
plastic surgery in pictures lol
1400yoJoke (October 11, 2008 at 11:36 pm)
my last response was to CoconutRen, youtube is fucking useless at this reply shit,
1400yoJoke (October 11, 2008 at 11:34 pm)
age lines etc. ????
L4s4gn3 (October 11, 2008 at 11:21 pm)
Photoshop just kicks ass!!!
ruichichan (October 11, 2008 at 9:05 pm)
that would suck so much for all of the magazine companies, commercials, and even stores. Basically that would be a label that says "I am lying to you completely" because no one would know how much you had to alter the picture.
vasilebujor67 (October 11, 2008 at 8:43 pm)
Hi, I consider that the easy way is to banne it! But that will fail, so I think laws has to be created because you miss inform the reader. On the photo next to the name of photographer there should be a phrase " digitally modified " or something like that. There are cases were is normal to modify the picture, when the man/woman suffer from burns or injuries or even aging, but the reader must be informed.Respectfully,Vasile Bujor
bivvyfox (October 11, 2008 at 7:59 pm)
It should not be banned. But it's still wrong. Something needs to change somewhere, most likely with the public. Videos like this are a great sign that change is in the process of happening. |
