ajax654 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Sorry, what exactly is so bad about this?He's just really American.And i totally get why he was telling her to let him finish.

cahillgreg (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Britain is a colonialist - people tend to come and get you when you relate to them on those terms - regular pandora's box. If you are going to throw the gauntlet down, then someone's going to pick it up. Live by the sword etc.

diggity0690 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Obviously Bush is wrong here. If Saddam had the WMD he would have used them when the Americans invaded.

dariusb23 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

In the last 30 years its pretty clear to see that America has put alot of money into Iraq to sponsor its military activities, The USSR did this also. There is no denying an invasion or any war kills both soldiers and civilians i dont deny that. But i believe a mistake was made not allowing iraq to be divided so to allow any parts that wished to join iran or become independent to do so. i feel thats one reason for the bloodshed of the kurds and other minorities.

dariusb23 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This interviewer was only hoping to make Bush collapse, didn't care what answer he would give and even if he started kissing her arse i doubt she would have stopped.However i do conceed that they invaded iraq without UN approval and believe that oil was one factor that pushed them into it and also they possibly felt it would took good as an effort against terror.

dariusb23 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Do you know much about Irish History? well the biggest source of casualties due to terrorism in the United Kingdom in the last 50 years was from the IRA (Irish Republican Army) who agreed a ceasefire in 2000 i believe. As well as this error the interviewer lost track and started saying "All irish believe" a complete exaggeration. What exactly did the irish government do about the Iraq problems? i dont have a clue

superdog797 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Bush oppoents' invasion criticism on the grounds that he was wrong about Saddam having WMDs specifically in 2003 is correct. However, opponents always overlook other reasons given and then narrow-mindedly dismiss the whole issue outright, although Bush is partly to blame for this. His administration blundered by focusing too much on the then-current existence of WMD's. So to clarify, it was not (certainly should not have been) the "whole point," but Bush messed up by narrowing focus too much.

anon540 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You're right. Opinion polls are only rigged about 100% of the time. We need to pay close attention to them so we can hear the voice of the people.Rather than actually listening to the voice of the people.

anon540 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Boo-hoo I'm crying about having to let volunteers go to the war that they volunteered to fight. It's too bad we had to go and steal those WMDs from the innocent Muslim people. Muslim is a good religion. Even if they do want to destroy America and the Jews they are a peaceful people and we had no right to take their bomb materials.

kaiser0soze (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

lol, she is?...but who watches Oprah anymore anyway? I don't watch t.v. and even when I used to watch t.v. I never watched her show.